Rabbanit Yael Leibowitz presents a fascinating interpretation of the biblical books of Ezra and Nehemiah, relevant today, in her easy-to-read 2025 book, “Ezra-Nehemiah: Retrograde Revolution.” She writes that during the period of Ezra and Nehemiah, life was filled with disappointment, “but discontent and gratitude…can coexist. The difficulties of the period are conceded, but the sorrow generated by those difficulties is not granted the power to drown out the joy of its triumphs. The community described in Ezra-Nehemiah savors the historic moments it is witness to, imperfect as they may be.” This is a lesson we need to learn.
The title “rabbanit” is given to women rabbis. In this splendid, informative book, Rabbanit Yael Leibowitz shows that few male or female rabbis have the knowledge and understanding of biblical literature and secular scholarly works, as she does, and can communicate them in intelligible English that increases the reader’s knowledge and enjoyment. Her book not only informs readers about the Bible, the history and mindset of the times, but also about the effects of all of this then and today. Most of the 286 pages are composed with the primary text in the top half, with an abundance of intriguing, informative details in the notes below.
The title of this book, “Retrograde Revolution,” means moving backwards or reverting to an earlier stage. This is one of the volume’s central themes. The only way that the ancient Judeans could improve was by adopting the lessons of the past. This was what Ezra and Nehemiah emphasized. The past, especially Torah teachings, is a signpost that guides Judaism’s direction. It is the lesson we must not ignore. George Santayana wrote, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” a warning against forgetting history to avoid repeating mistakes.
There is scholarly disagreement about virtually everything in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah. For example, there is no historical consensus on Ezra’s existence or mission due to a lack of extrabiblical evidence and conflicting scholarly interpretations. The dating of events is debated. Some scholars even doubt that Ezra existed or that he was Jewish.
The books Ezra and Nehemiah were originally a single book, commonly distinguished in scholarship as Ezra-Nehemiah. The two became separated with the first printed Rabbinic Bibles in the early 16th century, when Jews copied the late medieval Christian tradition. That Jews copied a Christian idea should surprise no one. An example of many others is the fact that it was Christians who divided the Bible into chapters, and Jews accepted the idea. While the division of Ezra and Nehemiah posed no problems, the division of the Bible into chapters makes some readers think the innovators were drunk in many instances. An example is the second chapter of the Bible, where the opening verses speaking of the creation of the seventh day belong in chapter one, which describes the first period of creation.
The books are composed in Hebrew and Aramaic. They represent the final chapter in the historical narrative of the Hebrew Bible. Nehemiah is the last historical book of the Hebrew Bible. Although the book of Esther appears after Nehemiah in the canon, the events in Esther occurred during the period between Ezra 6 and 7, between the first and second returns of the people exiled to Babylon to Israel. The last prophet, Malachi, was a contemporary of Nehemiah.
Nehemiah was a layman, not a priest like Ezra nor a prophet like Malachi. He served the Persian king in a secular capacity before leading a group of Jews to Jerusalem to rebuild its walls. His story shows that even people with little religious background can make a successful contribution to Judaism.
The current single biblical book, Ezra, has eight chapters, and Nehemiah has thirteen. All twenty-three are challenging to understand. Scholars have different interpretations of the books. Rabbanit Leibowitz offers her own in her volume, and what she writes makes sense.
The history of the time, as she sees it, is as follows. In 539 BCE, Cyrus II (559-530 BCE) defeated the Babylonians, who had destroyed the first Jewish Temple in 586 BCE and brought many Judeans, living in Judea, later called Israel, into exile in Babylon. A year later, in 538, Cyrus allowed the Judeans to leave Babylon and return to Judea. Some Judeans returned in three waves, but the majority chose to remain. Cyrus was succeeded by Darius I (522-486).
That a sizable number of Judeans decided to remain in Babylon should surprise no one. The Judean exile to Babylon began with the destruction of Judea in 586 BCE. When Cyrus allowed them to return home to Judea in 538, the Judeans had been in Babylon for 48 years. They were a different generation from those who were exiled in 586. Most never lived in Judea. Even the older generation had little recall of Judea, which they had left as children.
The Judean situation in 538 was similar to that of American Jews in 1948 when Israel was reestablished. The Judeans were treated well and participated in cultural events like non-Judeans. They were not oppressed. Many, like Nehemiah, held high level government positions. They had no good reason to leave a happy existence to return to a land that had been devastated in 586, that was surrounded by enemies, and required much repair.
There were three movements home. Each movement had a leader or leaders, a mission, opposition to the mission, and the movement’s mission was only partially successful. The first return to Judea was led by three men and occurred around 538-515. They rebuilt the Temple complex between 520 and 515 and restored Temple ritual. The primary leader of the first return was Zerubbabel, a descendant of King David. Cyrus appointed him as the governor of Judah.
The second group of returnees, under Ezra’s management, reinstated religious law and the study of Torah in the Judean community. Nehemiah led the third which constructed the city walls around Jerusalem.
While scholars debate the dates, Leibowitz offers 458-457 as the year when Ezra the Scribe arrived in Judea. She gives the later dates for Nehemiah’s governorship over Judea as 446- 433.
While the leaders Ezra and Nehemiah emphasized the need to learn from the past — one of the main themes of Leibowitz’s book — another theme in her book focuses on Nehemiah’s second return to Judea and finding that much of what he had worked so hard to accomplish no longer existed. It was as if the people took three steps forward, then two steps back. As a result, the book of Nehemiah ends with disappointment.
Rabbanit Leibowitz focuses on this and reveals an insight that will startle many readers. She shows that this discouraging ending is not unusual. Many biblical books close in disappointment, including each of the five books of Moses. She writes that this reflects human nature. The dance of three steps forward, followed by two steps back, is a common occurrence among people. It can and does discourage many people. But if we look to the lessons of the past, as Ezra and Nehemiah stressed, we will find that people will succeed despite failures.
Thus, the books of Ezra and Nehemiah tell us an intriguing historical story and show that while the countries of Cyrus and Darius no longer exist, why Israel does. It was due to the Jewish focus not only on the future but also on the lessons, actions, and failures of the past, and the realization that there are many elements in Judaism, including the Torah, that are blazing, even flashing signposts indicating how life can be improved despite failures.

Rabbanit Leibowitz focuses on this and reveals an insight that will startle many readers. She shows that this discouraging ending is not unusual. Many biblical books close in disappointment, including each of the five books of Moses. She writes that this reflects human nature. The dance of three steps forward, followed by two steps back, is a common occurrence among people. It can and does discourage many people. But if we look to the lessons of the past, as Ezra and Nehemiah stressed, we will find that people will succeed despite failures.
Should we be like confucius transmistter of the past civilziations? Confucius the upholder of the Chinese tradition and similar to Moses a well educated elite started the chinese tradition by looking into the past or similar to abraham by looking into the past of idol worshippers but different than confucius as he sought to seek what was proper of the past king’s rule of the state of Zhou.
Should we look towards the past to uphold the proper state of the future?
Yes, all wise people discovered that we need to understand the past to be able to move toward the future.
I enjoyed your article about Ezra and Nehemiah today.
Thank you, Turk.
Rabbanit Leibowitz focuses on this and reveals an insight that will startle many readers. She shows that this discouraging ending is not unusual. Many biblical books close in disappointment, including each of the five books of Moses.
Does this mean that Moses didn’t understand human psychology?
That we should uplift other people spirits in a positive mood rather than discourage people?
Or is there a deeper meaning in the ending of the torah?
The teaching is that although life is filled with difficult and even hurtful times, all can be improved if we are optimistic and work to attain the improvement.
Rabbanit Leibowitz’s interpretation of Ezra and Nehemiah highlights a crucial aspect of a very nuanced approach, dear Rabbi Israel Drazin. By recognizing that discontent and gratitude can coexist, she reminds us that life is rarely a simple binary of joy or sorrow, triumph or defeat. Rather, it is a rich tapestry of experiences, each with its own unique texture and flavor.
This lesson is indeed one that we need to learn, for it speaks to the very heart of the human condition. In our own lives, we often face difficulties and challenges that can evoke feelings of sorrow and discontent. Yet, it is precisely in these moments that we must strive to cultivate a sense of gratitude and appreciation for the triumphs, no matter how small they may seem.
Rabbanit Leibowitz’s interpretation of Ezra and Nehemiah offers a powerful example of this principle, demonstrating how the ancient text can speak to our contemporary experiences and challenges.
I believe that Rabbanit Leibowitz’s work offers a timely and timeless reminder of the importance of embracing the complexities of human experience, and of cultivating a sense of gratitude and appreciation for the triumphs that punctuate our lives, even in the midst of difficulty and disappointment. May her words inspire us to approach life with greater nuance, wisdom, and compassion. Best, stephen
We agree entirely.
After reading your blog, I plan to purchase the book from Koren Publishing. Thank you for sharing your wisdom; it is greatly appreciated. Shabua Tob! ✡️
Thank you for you compliment, Yaaqoub.
The concept of “retrograde revolution” resonates deeply with my own understanding of the importance of tradition and the study of the past, dear Rabbi Israel Drazin. In my own works , I try to compile and clarify the teachings of the Torah, demonstrating the relevance of its wisdom to the challenges of our time. I believe that the study of the past is essential to navigating the complexities of the present and building a brighter future.
Rabbanit Leibowitz’s emphasis on the coexistence of discontent and gratitude, sorrow and joy, is a powerful reminder of the nuanced and multifaceted nature of human experience. It is a lesson that I, too, sought to convey in my own writings, where I explore the nature of divine providence and the human condition.
The quote from George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” is a timely warning, and one that echoes the wisdom of the Torah itself. As I write in my own works, the study of history and the lessons of the past are essential to avoiding the mistakes of previous generations and building a more just and compassionate society.
I must say that I am heartened to see a woman scholar of such exceptional knowledge and understanding, Rabbanit Yael Leibowitz, contributing to the ongoing conversation about the meaning and relevance of the Torah in our lives today. Her work is a testament to the enduring power of Jewish tradition and the importance of ongoing study and interpretation. Best, stephen
We agree again.