Original ideas about Passover

 

The Origin of the Seder

The Passover Rite and early Rabbinic Judaism

By Baruch M. Bokser

Jewish Theological Seminary Press, 2002, 188 pages

This reprint of
the 1984 classic by Professor Bokser explains the origin of the Passover Seder
meal ritual. He notes that the Pascal sacrifice was an important part of Jewish
ritual and was biblically required. Every year hundreds of thousands of Jews
traveled to the Jerusalem temple to offer the sacrifice. But the temple was
destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE and the sacrifice could no longer be brought
there. What could the rabbis do to replace the Pascal sacrifice? Bokser states
that the rabbis instituted the Seder, a home ceremony rather than a temple
oriented one, and organized a set of procedures that the Jewish family should
do at home together. The rabbis minimized the importance of the sacrifice in
the Seder so that the people wouldn’t dwell on its loss and feel that the
Passover holiday was no longer significant and relevant.

How the Seder differed

Unlike the Pascal
sacrifice, the Seder was not a pilgrimage rite from home to Jerusalem ending in
the offering. The rabbis’ Seder is a celebratory meal at home commemorating the
exodus from Egyptian slavery; unlike the biblical sacrificial ritual, the Seder
became both a family festivity and an intellectual endeavor; “the narration of
the Exodus experience (became) a central part of the (home) ceremony”; the
“child’s question (introduced as part of the Seder narration did) not depend on
the procedures surrounding the sacrifice and its blood”;  the family “uses wine instead of meat from the
sacrifice to express one’s joy”; “the unleavened bread and bitter herbs were
originally secondary but have been elevated in status equal to that of the
Passover sacrifice”; while the Levites monopolized the singing in the temple,
all Jews “sing psalms to God; and Jews not only focused on the nation’s past
history, but were required to identify their own lives during the Seder “with
the Exodus experience.” Since the new emphasis is on the present and future
rather than the past, “the lack of reference to Moses (in the narration) is
only natural. While Moses had a role in Egyptian liberation, he does not figure
in any of the later instances of redemption.”

About a century
and a half later, around the year 200 CE, the editor of the Mishnah, the first Jewish collection of
laws and other things, described the newly-developed home ritual for the first
time in writing. Bokser discusses all of the information contained in the Mishnah. He notes that although the Mishnah is presenting a new way of
observing Passover, it tries to cover the fact that it is offering an
innovation, and leaves readers to believe that it is simply codifying “a well-tried
and established road.” This Mishnaic ceremony
was itself later changed in many ways. For example, the Mishnah has the youngster ask three questions at the Seder, one of
which concerned the Pascal sacrifice. This was later amended to four questions,
the Pascal sacrifice query was dropped, and two new ones inserted.

Where did the rabbis get their idea about a
home ceremony?

Bokser states that
the rabbis derived their scheme to turn the Temple ritual into a family
celebration from the depiction in Exodus 12
of the family celebration in Egypt just prior to the exodus from slavery during
which families gathered in their homes and ate a roasted lamb with matzah and bitter herbs. The rabbis
renewed this one-time Egyptian event and expanded it into the Seder.

Some
scholars disagree. They insist that the Seder is a copy of the Greek symposium
and not Exodus 12, described by Plato
and Herodotus in books called The Symposium.
But Bokser shows that the Seder is radically different. The symposium was an
informal gathering of men where food was eaten and lots of wine drunk.
Conversation was usually a part of the symposium, but the subjects discussed
were not generally pre-set and formalized.

 

The Seder, in
contrast, is a requirement, not an occasional event, with a set time, and women
and children attend. Even a poor person must recline at the meal and all must
drink at least four cups of wine. It is not a time of revelry like the
symposium; a blessing is said over each of the four cups, the amount of wine in
each cup is set, and the wine may not be too strong. Several ceremonies must be
performed, such as dipping foods, and certain foods must be eaten, such as the matzah. The subject of conversation is
set, the exodus, certain readings must be recited, and a minimum of prescribed
questions asked. Unlike the symposium that ended in drunken frivolity,
after-dinner frivolity at the Seder is prohibited.

Another approach

Bokser’s
analysis of the Seder origin is persuasive. However, the analysis would have
been improved if he would have recognized that the family celebration in Egypt
mentioned in Exodus 12 was not a
Pascal sacrifice, as I describe in my article Why was the first Passover different from all other Passovers? and
if he would have answered the question, why was the Pascal sacrifice a lowly
lamb rather than the usual more pricey and prestigious calf?

The so-called Passover in Egypt

In my article, I showed
that the Exodus 12 activities were very
different than subsequent Passovers. It was a joyful family or neighborly meal
in which the Israelites demonstrated how happy they were that they would soon
be free. In contrast, subsequent Passovers recalled the exodus event. Since the
Israelites were descendants of pastoral ancestors who shepherded lambs and were
probably accustomed to mark special occasions by eating them, they were told in
Exodus 12 to celebrate the upcoming liberation
by eating their traditional festive lamb, in a close-nit family or neighborhood
celebration, much like the American holiday of Thanksgiving.

Moses told the
Israelites to eat this festive lamb with the best kind of bread, matzah,
unleavened bread, and season the lamb and make it tasty with sharp herbs. The
traditional view is that unleavened bread is poor bread consumed because the
Israelites had to rush out of Egypt with insufficient time for the bread to rise,
and bitter herbs recall the bitter toils of slavery. This idea is clearly
inapplicable to the pre-exodus celebration. Moses instructed them to eat
unleavened bread at the festive meal four days before the event, more than
sufficient time to bake leavened bread. Accordingly, Arnold Ehrlich suggests,
in his Mikra Ki-pheshuto, that the
ancients considered leavened bread inferior to unleavened. He points out, among
other proofs, that Abraham in 18:6 served his three guests a sumptuous meal
that included ugot, and ugot are unleavened bread, as indicated
in 12:39, where Scripture states ugot matzot. Abraham had ordered that
an animal be taken from the herd, slaughtered, cooked, and prepared for his
guests. This takes time; time enough for the leaven to rise. This explains why
leavened bread was prohibited with sacrifices that were burnt on the altar for
God (23:18 and Deuteronomy 16:3);
only matzah were offered to God because it was the better bread.

Thus, the bread
used at the pre-exodus celebration was matzah. After the exodus, both the matzah and bitter herbs acquired an
additional meaning. The former also symbolized the haste in which the
Israelites left Egypt, and the latter the bitter nature of slavery.

Thus the Exodus 12 celebration was radically
different than the subsequent Passovers. It was a joyful thanksgiving meal in
which the Israelites demonstrated their happiness that they would soon be free.
There was no sacrifice. In contrast, the purpose of subsequent Passovers was to
offer the lamb as a Pascal sacrifice and recall the exodus event that followed
the meal. I suggest that readers read this article for more details. It is on
my website.

Had Bokser
realized that the Egyptian meal was a celebratory thanksgiving event, he could
have expanded on his idea and pointed out that the rabbis resurrected this
family meal, that was not related to the Pascal sacrifice to replace the
sacrifice, and retained its joyous victorious spirit in the creation of the
Seder together with readings that recall the slavery, making the Seder have two
opposite but related goals, just as the matzah
and bitter herbs have dual symbolism, the slavery and the exodus.

Why was the Pascal
sacrifice a lamb and not a calf?

Many rabbis
considered the Pascal sacrifice the most important offering. Thus, we would
have expected that the sacrifice would be from the preferred larger and more
costly calf. Why was it a lamb? The lamb was the chosen animal to commemorate
the eating of the lamb at the Exodus 12
family celebration anticipating the exodus. Once this is understood, the rabbis’
use of the Exodus 12 family
celebration as a substitute for the Pascal sacrifice is seen as even more
appropriate. The Pascal sacrifice recalled the Exodus 12 celebratory meal; now the revitalized Exodus 12 meal with additions and
changes replaces the sacrifice that had recalled it.

Summary

The rabbis were
faced with a problem. What could they do since the most-important Temple
offering, the Pascal sacrifice, could no longer be offered in the destroyed temple?
They revived the Exodus 12
celebratory meal with over a dozen changes and additions.

Do You Want To Be Notified of New Blog Posts?

Email:

Categories

Archives